Drunk
Driving Cases
Alaska DWI Lawyer
Frederick T. Slone, Esq.
SAMPLE
CASE NO. 17 - Municipality v. R.G. (District Court, Anchorage)
An Anchorage
police officer saw R.G.’s pickup sitting diagonally on a street
leading to a parking lot, apparently partially blocking a compact
car from leaving the parking lot. As the officer approached the
two vehicles, the compact car drove away and R.G. started driving
away in his pickup. The officer turned his overhead lights on to
stop the pickup, and the pickup accelerated and continued driving
past the officer. The officer followed the truck until it parked
in the end of a condominium complex parking lot. As R.G. and his
friend left the vehicle, the officer contacted them.
The officer
conducted field "sobriety" tests which were allegedly
failed and arrested R.G. for DWI. As he was attempting to arrest
R.G., R.G. allegedly resisted the arrest.
R.G.
was transported to a police station where a breath test was administered
with a .111 result. After the breath test was administered, R.G.
requested a second breath test. The officer refused this request
but offered him the opportunity for a blood test. R.G. did have
a blood test and the blood alcohol level from the analysis of that
blood was .145.
R.G.
was charged with DWI and Resisting Arrest.
R.G.
retained Mr. Slone in both the DMV proceedings and the criminal
case. In the DMV proceeding, Mr. Slone subpoenaed the arresting
officer and the officer who conducted the breath test. Under cross-examination
by Mr. Slone, the officer who conducted the breath test admitted
that R.G. belched just prior to the administration of the breath
test. Mr. Slone requested dismissal of the administrative license
revocation action on the grounds that the breath test training manual
requires that an additional 15 minute observation period be complied
with if an individual burps or belches. Mr. Slone also requested
dismissal of the license revocation action on the grounds that there
was an illegal stop, and the officer violated R.G.’s right to an
independent test of his choice when the officer failed to administer
a second breath test as requested by R.G. Based on the evidence
produced at the hearing, the hearing officer was compelled to dismiss
the revocation action and R.G.’s license was reinstated.
In the
criminal case, Mr. Slone filed pretrial motions to suppress the
breath test evidence, and suppress all evidence obtained after the
stop, and dismiss the case. After a pretrial evidentiary hearing,
the judge granted Mr. Slone’s request, holding that the officer
did not have sufficient justification for stopping R.G.’s vehicle
in the first instance. Therefore all evidence obtained after the
stop was thrown out and the case was dismissed in its entirety.
You can
read other cases by clicking below
Get a
Free Evaluation of your
drunk driving case Now
|